1923 Season 2: Taylor Sheridan’s Slow March Or Just Stalling?

Fans of Taylor Sheridan’s work, who have long admired his storytelling, have found themselves disheartened by the pacing & direction of 1923 S2.

Even the brightest stars can lose their shine if they stop looking at the sky. As a long-time admirer of Taylor Sheridan’s storytelling brilliance, this feels like the right lens through which to view his recent work. There was a time when his shows, from Yellowstone to Landman, were the kind of stories that made you feel something deep in your bones.

But much like a musician who hits a sour note, Sheridan’s latest endeavors seem to echo past missteps, leaving fans yearning for the sharp, compelling narratives we once cherished.

Much like the growing dissatisfaction during Yellowstone Season 5, it feels like Sheridan’s 1923 Season 2 is suffering from an overdose of filler. Characters are popping in and out without much purpose, and we can’t help but wonder if the show is just padding itself for the sake of it.

Instead of a thrilling narrative, we’re left with what feels like unnecessary side quests.

1923 season 2: Taylor Sheridan’s slow march or just stalling?

Now, don’t get us wrong, we’re all for a slow burn when it’s earned. But there’s a fine line between creating anticipation and testing a viewer’s patience. With 1923 Season 2, fans have an overwhelming sense that the story is trudging along at a pace that isn’t just leisurely—it’s becoming a slog.

Episodes seem to be filling time rather than moving the story forward. Spencer’s journey, which should be a focal point, feels weighed down by the endless parade of ‘villains of the week’ and unnecessary distractions. Instead of propelling the plot to a thrilling climax, we’re left watching the plot get bogged down by side stories that feel like filler.

Needless to say, Taylor Sheridan’s brilliance as a storyteller is clear, but when you stretch yourself too thin, the results are often less than stellar. His involvement in multiple projects might be diluting the quality of each. Fans have voiced their frustrations, and we can’t help but agree: the magic of Sheridan’s earlier works seems to be slipping through the cracks.

One fan points out that, much like Yellowstone Season 5, Sheridan seems to be stalling the plot due to a lack of fresh material after the exit of Kevin Costner. The former added unnecessary plotlines and even inserted his own character. It felt like there just wasn’t enough material to carry the show forward after Costner’s departure.

The fan suggests that this trend is continuing in 1923 Season 2, with the show meandering rather than progressing at a natural pace. The mention of the bad guy spotting Alexandra and fans rolling their eyes rather than feeling anxious is a clear sign of disappointment. The emotional connection that fans once had with the show seems to be slipping away—what should be a suspenseful moment just feels flat. Let’s read a few fans’ comments:

This series feels like it’s purposely going nowhere.
byu/Reverse_Flash_ in1923Series

 

Comment
byu/Reverse_Flash_ from discussion
in1923Series

Fans are feeling let down because the potential for a rich narrative is there, but it’s not being fully realized. The pacing and lack of depth are causing viewers to lose their patience, and some are even saying they’ll wait until the whole season is out before they continue watching—likely because they don’t want to invest in a show that feels like it’s stalling or stretching itself thin.

Will 1923 return for a third season? Or is it time to let go?

1923 has won our hearts with its gritty portrayal of the Duttons and their rugged world, but now, as Season 2 rolls on, the question on everyone’s lips is: Will there be a third season, or have we reached the finish line?

Taylor Sheridan has been open about his vision for the show, calling this season the “second half” of Season 1 (via Deadline). But here’s the thing: with all these expanding spin-offs and stories, will the Duttons’ saga get the conclusion it deserves, or are we just dragging out a good thing? One of the show’s stars, Michelle Randolph, even chimed in, joking that she’d like to see “no tears” in Season 3.

Maybe she’s onto something—could the Duttons finally catch a break, or is the relentless march of hardship going to keep dominating their lives?

Brandon Sklenar, one of the stars of the show, also weighed in (via THR), calling 1923 “one piece” with a split in the middle. He said that the series will ultimately “conclude” with Season 2, but that didn’t stop fans from hoping for more. The real question here is whether 1923 is headed for an elegant finish or if it’s just running in place.